First is personell. Staff is already spread a bit thin during the con trying to keep everything else under control, so we'd need volunteers to run the wristbands or whatever.
To address this first, I was thinking that most of the personnel used to traffic the lines, especially through the busy intersections, could be used to hand out the arm bands instead. I've never really counted how many are used, or if there is a solid number, but it seems that this idea, or ones like it, would drastically lower the amount of "Line-staffers" needed.
Second is panel jumpers. You suggested using reusable wristbands to keep costs down. How would you keep people from getting wristbands 3 panels ahead of the one they want to see, keeping others from getting in? If you issue enough wristbands for the room capacity, and ONLY allow that number in, you'll have unfilled panels and dissappointed congoers. I think that's worse than the lines by a mile.
Your first part is very valid, and something that I didn't think of at all. I'll have to brainstorm an idea that would be both cost effective and not too difficult to implement.
The second part, however, I don't agree with. Doesn't NDK do this already? There are just long lines associated with it. You can only allow so many into the room, anyhow, so anyone waiting at the farther end of the line gets turned away. Pulling from one of my previous posts, an idea such as a "late-comers' line could form for only a few minutes after the panel starts. The staff could see if there were any open seats (from people not showing up with armbands), and if so, allow people without armbands to join in. Now, this is where your first problem of people waiting until later panels comes into play. Again, I'll have to brainstorm on that.
Third is the cost. Wristbands aren't free. Adding more costs in one area usually means reducing something else. While Shima's numbers may have been a joke, she still has a point.
Indeed. Cost is always an issue. I can't sway the NDK staff one way or another on cost management, I'm sure. But I think any idea should be considered, if it's feasible.
And again, I was NOT trying to dismiss Shima's post. I was merely just trying to bring down the spectrum a tad. While her point is valid, looking at a number such as 175k where the more relative number would be in the low thousands is very off-putting and confusing.
Thanks for the response! ^_^